Sunday, May 28, 2006

The Sunday Trumpet---5/28



Tera at Sweet Perdition likes scary movies, and has seen a lot of them that I've never even heard of.

So when I started to read her review of An American Haunting, I thought...wow, a creep-fest with Donald Sutherland and Sissy Spacek!

Aside from the movie Carrie, I don't think I remember Sissy being in other horror flicks after her Oscar win with Coal Miner's Daughter.

I'm a little surprised that she'd sign on to do horror again. And crappy horror at that.

As for Donald Sutherland, he's creeped the sh*t out of me since he played an old man diving face first under 14-year-old Diane Lane's skirt in The Oldest Living Confederate Widow. He could do a Jello commercial and he'd still skeeve me out.

Although I've always found the story of The Bell Witch interesting, I'm definitely going to cross this one off my viewing list.

Thanks, Tera!

Go over there and give her a shout!


Be A Gasbag!

If you're interested in joining our Sporadic Gasbag Roundtable review team, you can find the rules and sign up here!


For links to our previous reviews, visit us at The Sporadic Gasbag Roundtable.

An American Haunting


As a drive-in mutant who doesn’t drive, a lot of bad movies are my fault. I’ve asked a cousin to see Hostel with me, and she spent thirty minutes behind the palms of her hands; told a friend that we “have to” rent (a heavily edited) Last House on the Left, because my dad made me promise never to see it. I’ve even begged my mother—my own mother!—to drive clear across town to the ultra-expensive multiplex for Cabin Fever. But when it comes to the worst mainstream movie we’ve seen all year, I can’t take all the blame.

“Tera!” my mom said in the car one day. “Donald Sutherland’s in a new scary movie!”

And I said, “Nunh-unh!”

“Really. It’s called An American Haunting. And it looks really good.”

Donald Sutherland in a new scary movie. After chasing down little girls in red coats and solving The Rosary Murders—not to mention fathering the creepiest guy in Hollywood—the senior Sutherland could surely scare the crap out of me again. Especially with Sissy Spacek involved. (Remember when she went on that killing spree with Martin Sheen in Badlands? And anyone who tells you that Carrie isn’t scary is a fool).

On opening weekend, I inform Mom that there’s a 1:30 show, and that we’ll be there. I pay six dollars. And two hours later, I am extremely pissed off.

An American Haunting, as its trailer tells us, is based on “the only recorded case in history where a spirit caused the death of a human being.” It’s also not very scary, but compensates by being incredibly loud.

In the 1800s, landowner John Bell and his wife—Sutherland and Spacek, respectively— have a beautiful daughter named Betsy. The Bells live out in the wilderness, so there are lots of wolves (ROAAR!!!!) and John shoots them (BANG!! BANG!!), But he still has time to cheat the neighborhood witch out of a ton of money, and the church, which he’s helped build, decides in his favor.

The witch is not pleased.

Soon, weird things start happening to John and Betsy. He gets sicker and sicker; she gets pulled upstairs by her hair (THUMP!! THUMP!! THUMP!!), thrown into walls (THWACK!! THWACK!!), and dragged around her room until she scratches up the wooden floor with her fingernails (SCREE!! SCREE!!). By the time she starts flopping on her bed and the doctor thinks she’s having seizures, I have to wonder: Why have we remade The Exorcist twice in the past nine months?

But fifth-generation plot points aren’t enough to make a movie bad. An American Haunting is mostly what Bart and Lisa Simpson would call “meh”—it treads water for 90 minutes, doing nothing well but avoiding Trumpet-worthy awfulness.

And then it ends.

The end of An American Haunting is impossible to spoil, because it has nothing to do with the movie. The filmmakers didn’t even shoot it; they just splashed some words on the screen and expected us to read them. Apparently, Betsy created the ghost herself to protect herself from her father. Why on earth would Betsy need, even subconsciously, to be protected from this guy? I have no idea, but here’s my completely evidenceless theory: He was molesting her. Obviously, an upstanding citizen—who works for the church! double points!—sexually assaults children.

So, what’s your theory? Why would a 10-to-12-year-old girl hate her dad enough to create a psychic disturbance? Don’t worry if you haven’t seen the movie: you know just as much about John Bell’s dark side as the rest of us. Go wild. (Bonus points for involving the Terminator). Fly, my beauties! Fly!

Sunday, May 21, 2006

The Sunday Trumpet---5/21


Today's Sunday Strumpet*---er---Trumpet is Madonna!

Our friend Sophia explains her love/hate relationship with the pop icon as she reviews her newest release.

Come visit her blog and check it out!


Be A Gasbag!

If you're interested in joining our Sporadic Gasbag Roundtable review team, you can find the rules and sign up here!

For links to our previous reviews, visit us at The Sporadic Gasbag Roundtable.

*Thanks, Pooper!

Sunday, May 14, 2006

The Sunday Trumpet---5/14




Our friend Miss Keeks scoffs at simpering and tears apart City of Light, a historical novel set in her hometown, by Lauren Belfer.

Grover Cleveland a rapist? How could he find his feet, much less his, well you know...

Wait a minute. I got him mixed up with the president in the bathtub.

Never mind.

Anyhoo, run over and give Keeks a shout!


Be A Gasbag!


If you're interested in joining our Sporadic Gasbag Roundtable review team, you can find the rules and sign up here!

For links to our previous reviews, visit us at The Sporadic Gasbag Roundtable.

Sunday, May 07, 2006

A Pukelitzer Prize for FICTION


For the past three years I have walked into my favorite bookstores, seen 200 copies of Dan Brown’s The Da Vince Code sitting on the “#1 Bestseller” shelf, and asked me, “When is the highly-intelligent reading public going to give some other piece of shit a chance at being #1?” I mean, it just isn’t fair: In three years time, Nora Roberts and James Patterson have each written 30 or 40 pieces of shit apiece that surely deserve to be #1. But noooo, the misspelled Da Vinci (the name is da Vinci, small d) just sits there, week after week after week, hogging the coveted top spot. Hog, hog, hog.

(If I failed to offend anyone in that first paragraph, just wait.)

First, to the legitimate reviews. Publishers Weekly called it a “page-turner.” BFD. I contend that every book ever written is a page-turner: unless one turns the page, one cannot read pages 2, 4, 6, and so on, can one. AudioFile, which reviews audiobooks, said it was “an exciting read.” If you are expecting me to make a snide remark about reading an audiobook, your expectation is in error. Rather, I have a memo to all of the hotshot book reviewers out there. MEMO to all of you hotshot reviewers out there: "Read" is a fucking VERB, an ACTION word meaning, “To read”. One can read (VERB) an exciting (ADJECTIVE) book (NOUN), but in no manner, shape, or form can a book (NOUN) be an exciting (ADJECTIVE) read (NOUN). I suggest, then, that you professional reviewers return to third grade for a verb-noun refresher course and clean out the asspimples in your brain while you're at it.

The Da Vince Code. I’m getting to it. Just give me a minute.

I am a multi-genre reader of books, but my preferred bedtime genre has always been mystery/thriller. And boy, have I read some dandies over the years. Ken Follett’s early thrillers like Eye of the Needle and The Key to Rebecca. The Day of the Jackal by Frederick Forsyth. Robert Ludlum’s thrillers, written while he was actually alive, like The Bourne Identity and The Rhinemann Exchange. These books thrilled me, as in “To cause to feel a sudden intense sensation; to excite greatly”. Yes, folks, these books gave me mental orgasms.

But for me, The Da Vince Code did nothing but shoot blanks. I didn’t even have time to shoot a blank because I fell asleep first. What was a clever premise was, in fact, a snooze-a-thon. When I finally finished it over a period of several weeks, which is always a bad sign for a thriller, I gave it to Martha to prop up the bum leg on her storage shelves in the garage. She informs me that it works wonderfully as a propper-upper, so I guess my entire $20 investment wasn’t a total waste.

For those who must have a synopsis, here it is in shorthand. Robert Langdon, a famed symbologist, hero, personality of a mud pie. Sophie Neveu, a noted cryptologist for the French Surete, co-hero, extremely beautiful, personality of a French mud pie. The Holy Grail. Yes, that Holy Grail. The Knights Templar. Opus Dei, a whacko Catholic cult. A fellow from Opus Dei putters with flagellation. He wears a contraption around his thigh with sharp spikes that continually poke him in the balls. Poke, poke, poke. Leo da Vinci’s painting of the Last Supper. SPOILER: Jesus and Mary Magdalene and the horizontal polka. Mary, a fruitful lass, births a child after the crucifixion. 2000 years later, there’s a whole shitload of Jesus and Mary offspring running around loose. End of synopsis.

I’ll admit that I was taken in, just once, by this stupid story. Brown contends that one of the apostles in da Vinci’s Last Supper is not an apostle at all, but is in fact Mary Magdalene herself. Mildly curious, then, I took my old paint-by-numbers Last Supper off the wall and scrupulously searched it for an apostle in drag. Nope, didn’t find her, even though my painting-by-numbers was extraordinarily detailed and good.

So why, then, has this book remained a bestseller for over three years? Because, folks, millions of asspimples think this shit is TRUE! That’s right: as Tweety Bird would say, “It’s TWUE, it’s TWUE!” Only it isn’t. This is a fucking NOVEL, you idiots. If it were twue it would be in NON-fiction, or even in the religion section on the “Cockamamie Pseudo-Religious Theories” shelf. If it were twue, it would be #1 on the NON-fiction bestseller list—in which case James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces would have to switch over to #1 on the FICTION bestseller list, where it has rightly belonged all along.

To prove my point, do a Google search of The Da Vinci Code. Go ahead. Be astounded by 68,400,000 hits.

While I’m here, I might as well get The Movie out of the way, too. It starts on May 19, and it stars a formerly-great-actor-who-sold-out-for-the-money, Tom Hanks. Audrey Tatou, who was a wonderful Amelie in 2001, stars as the beautiful cryptologist. Even worse, little Opie Taylor, now known as Ron Howard, directed it. I could cry. Expect mud pie personalities, lots of meaningful “looks”, and industrial-size magnifying glasses. There will be a humdinger of a chase scene around the museum district of Paris. The music will be loud to cover the bad acting and stir emotions, like the shrieking violins in Psycho. The cockamamie theories will fly with abandon, giving no one the slightest chance to say, “Now wait just a durn minute!”

Unfortunately, I am only one humble, pissant reviewer. The pros will hate it, but millions of the faithful flock will flock to the theater anyway. All I can do is leave you with a word of caution:

If you go to the movie, and if there is an odd-looking stranger sitting next to you, and if he keeps shifting uncomfortably in his seat, then he is probably wearing a contraption that continually pokes him in the balls.

Poke, poke, poke.